Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 580
Filter
1.
Contact Dermatitis ; 90(6): 585-593, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38417425

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Intensified hand hygiene measures were recommended for preventing the spread of SARS-CoV-2. However, these measures can lead to skin damage and the development of hand eczema, particularly among health professionals. OBJECTIVES: This pilot study aimed to evaluate the effects of repeated antiseptic use on healthy skin under controlled conditions and to assess the emollient use. METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers (nine females, age = 22.3 ± 2.8 years (mean ± SD), Fitzpatrick phototypes II and III) with no skin diseases were recruited. Antiseptic was applied daily for 3 weeks on the volar sides of forearms. Emollient cream was also applied daily. Skin assessments were performed using non-invasive methods (transepidermal water loss-TEWL, skin hydration, erythema and melanin content). RESULTS: Prolonged antiseptic use increased TEWL, decreased hydration and elevated erythema and melanin levels. Emollient cream significantly reduced TEWL and improved hydration on antiseptic-treated sites, and also enhanced hydration on intact skin. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged use of antiseptics can have adverse effects on the skin, including barrier disruption and inflammation. Emollient showed promise in improving skin hydration and reducing the damage caused by antiseptics. Further research with a larger sample is needed to confirm these findings and assess emollient efficacy during frequent antiseptic use.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local , Emollients , Humans , Female , Pilot Projects , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/adverse effects , Male , Emollients/adverse effects , Young Adult , Adult , Erythema/chemically induced , Erythema/prevention & control , Water Loss, Insensible/drug effects , Skin/drug effects , Melanins , COVID-19/prevention & control
2.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 23(5): 1685-1702, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38279521

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Collagen, a critical structural protein found abundantly in animal skin and bones, has become increasingly recognized for its potential therapeutic role in skincare. Despite growing interest, the scientific evidence for the efficacy of collagen sheet masks remains limited. The principal objective of our study was to provide insights into the multifaceted role of collagen in skin health, with a specific focus on its application in collagen sheet masks. METHODS: The effects of a collagen sheet mask consisting of >92% native bovine collagen were investigated. The soluble protein components of the collagen matrix were analyzed and the influence of soluble collagen components on fibroblast regulation was examined. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) analysis was performed for structural analysis and effect on irritated skin. Five different clinical studies were conducted, including a comparison of the diversity of the skin microbiome, the tolerance and local irritating reactions in atopic dermatitis, an evaluation of skin redness after UV radiation, wrinkle reduction, and hydration and skin roughness of the collagen mask in comparison to a pre-soaked cellulose sheet mask. RESULTS: The collagen mask contains soluble protein components, including small collagen peptides. The mask showed potential for promoting fibroblast activity. SEM analysis showed a native collagen structure similar to human dermis. The mask maintained the skin microbiome diversity and decreased skin pH levels. It demonstrated good tolerability on both intact and lesional skin and had a significant effect in reducing erythema caused by UV radiation compared to other skincare products. It showed significant improvements in skin hydration and the volume of eye wrinkles and was more effective than pre-soaked cellulose sheet masks. CONCLUSION: Collagen sheet masks have the potential to positively impact skin health and appearance by increasing hydration, reducing erythema, minimizing wrinkles, and maintaining a healthy skin microbiome and skin barrier.


Subject(s)
Collagen , Skin Aging , Skin , Humans , Skin Aging/drug effects , Skin Aging/radiation effects , Skin/drug effects , Skin/radiation effects , Skin/microbiology , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Animals , Fibroblasts/drug effects , Dermatitis, Atopic , Cattle , Erythema/etiology , Erythema/prevention & control , Ultraviolet Rays/adverse effects , Male
3.
Lasers Surg Med ; 56(1): 75-80, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37661604

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Cryomodulation, or the delivery of controlled cooling to downregulate inflammatory processes in the skin, has been proposed to mitigate acute side effects following various dermatologic treatments. A new controlled cooling device has been developed to deliver cryomodulation for a range of different indications. In this clinical study, we evaluate the device for the reduction of pain, erythema, and edema following nonablative fractional resurfacing (NAFR). METHODS: A single-blind, prospective, randomized, split-face study was conducted to assess the efficacy of the controlled dermal cooling device for the reduction of pain, edema, and erythema following nonablative fractional resurfacing with the dual 1550 nm erbium-doped fiber and 1927 nm thulium fiber laser. Subjects were randomized to receive a 10-min controlled cooling treatment to either the left or right side of the face immediately following full face NAFR. Pain ratings were recorded immediately postlaser treatment and immediately postcryomodulation treatment. At follow-up, subjects were surveyed for reduction of side effects and treatment satisfaction. Blinded review of photographs by two physicians was conducted to assess efficacy. RESULTS: The average pain score for subjects immediately post-NAFR was 5.15. Following cryomodulation, the average pain score on the treatment side was reduced by 69%, to an average of 1.6. The untreated side of the face was reduced by 19%, to an average of 4.2. Overall, 90% of subjects endorsed reduced discomfort. At follow-up, 70% of subjects reported a noticeable improvement in edema and 50% reported a noticeable improvement in erythema between the treatment and control sides. The average subject satisfaction score for the cryomodulation treatment was 4.2. All subjects (100%) indicated that they would elect to undergo the cryomodulation treatment again. Both blinded physician reviewers were successful in identifying the cryomodulation-treated side of the face in 70% of subjects' posttreatment photographs. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this split-face study support the efficacy of a global cryomodulation device for the reduction of pain, edema, and erythema following NAFR treatment. Cryomodulation was delivered in a simple 10 min procedure and yielded high patient satisfaction.


Subject(s)
Erythema , Laser Therapy , Humans , Prospective Studies , Single-Blind Method , Erythema/etiology , Erythema/prevention & control , Pain/etiology , Pain/prevention & control , Inflammation , Edema/etiology , Edema/prevention & control , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 23(2): 382-390, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37853844

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) is a common complication after laser surgeries. Recent studies applied epidermal growth factor (EGF) on the lasered area after laser surgery to decrease the incidence of PIH with controversial results. Therefore, a comprehensive literature review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to investigate the issue. METHODS: Two reviewers independently searched the literatures, extracted, and analyzed the data. A total of seven RCTs involving 169 patients were included to evaluate the efficacy of EGF on recovery and PIH prevention after laser surgery. RESULTS: The results show that the incidence of PIH in the EGF group was relatively lower than that in the control group, although the difference was not statistically significant (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.33 ~ 1.25, p = 0.19). However, the EGF groups had a significant decrease in melanin index (MI) scores at the 1st month after the laser surgery when compared to the control groups (SMD -1.57, 95% CI -2.83 ~ -0.31, p = 0.01). In addition, the patients on the EGF side rated significantly higher satisfactory scores (SMD 0.49, 95% CI 0.22 ~ 0.76, p = 0.0004). There was no significant difference as regard to changes in MI at the 2nd week and 2nd month, erythema index (EI), and trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL) at days 3 and 7 after laser therapy, respectively. CONCLUSION: The current meta-analysis found a limited temporary inhibitory effect of EGF-containing topical products on PIH with no significant effect on reducing post-laser erythema or promoting epidermal barrier repair. More studies are needed in the future due to the small sample size and marked intergroup heterogeneities.


Subject(s)
Hyperpigmentation , Laser Therapy , Humans , Epidermal Growth Factor/therapeutic use , Hyperpigmentation/etiology , Hyperpigmentation/prevention & control , Erythema/etiology , Erythema/prevention & control , Laser Therapy/adverse effects , Epidermis , Melanins
5.
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed ; 39(5): 419-427, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36867064

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Two previously published clinical studies by our group assessed erythema and pigmentation responses in outdoor conditions with three reference sunscreens, comparing their effectiveness under the full spectrum of natural sunlight. These studies followed an almost identical protocol but were conducted in two different locations and in two ethnic groups: broadly, Chinese (Singapore) and White European (Mauritius). We analysed the data from these two study populations to compare differences in skin response according to ethnicity. METHODS: The analysis included 128 subjects (53 were Chinese from Singapore and 75 were White European from Mauritius and Singapore). Products used were the reference sunscreens P3 (sun protection factor [SPF] 15), P5 (SPF 30) and P8 (SPF 50+) from ISO norm 24444:2019. Participants were exposed to outdoor sunlight for 2-3 h, depending on baseline ITA. Endpoints were erythema at 24 h: clinical score and colorimetry (Δa*) and pigmentation at 1 week based on colorimetry (ΔL* and ΔITA). RESULTS: Among those with baseline ITA > 41, there were differences in erythemal response between the Chinese and White European groups, the White European group being more erythematous and also having a higher rate of photoprotection failure particularly at SPFs 15 and 30. CONCLUSION: Differences in skin response to sun influenced by ethnicity should be taken into account when making recommendations on sun safety.


Subject(s)
Ethnicity , Sunscreening Agents , Humans , Sunscreening Agents/therapeutic use , Ultraviolet Rays/adverse effects , Sun Protection Factor , Erythema/prevention & control , Skin
6.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 22(8): 2239-2245, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36943760

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Extracellular matrix (ECM) components promote the development of skin wounds by providing biological scaffolds and regenerative microenvironments. AIMS: To evaluate the beneficial effects of human dermal fibroblast-derived ECM after fractional carbon dioxide laser resurfacing in Asians. PATIENTS/METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled, split-face study, 15 participants with features of facial skin aging were treated with a single session of fractional carbon dioxide laser, followed by the application of either ECM (ECM group) or placebo (control group). In vivo skin parameters were measured at baseline and after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment using the Antera 3D®, Cutometer® MPA580, Dermascan®, and Tewameter®. RESULTS: A total of 14 participants (mean age 45.1 ± 9.7 years) completed the study. The change in melanin level was significantly lower in the ECM group than in the control group at week 12 (p < 0.05). Transient increase in erythema level was observed at week 4 in the control group, and the change in the erythema level was greater in the control group than in the ECM group (p = 0.014). Though the ECM group showed improvements in the dermal density, texture, transepidermal water loss, marionette lines (volume, maximum depth, and average depth), and nasolabial folds (volume, maximum depth, and length), no significant differences were found between the two groups. Treatment-related adverse events were not reported. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that human dermal fibroblast-derived ECM may be used as adjunctive therapy after fractional carbon dioxide resurfacing to prevent postinflammatory hyperpigmentation in Asians.


Subject(s)
Extracellular Matrix , Hyperpigmentation , Laser Therapy , Lasers, Gas , Skin Aging , Adult , Humans , Middle Aged , Asian , Carbon Dioxide , Cicatrix/etiology , Erythema/etiology , Erythema/prevention & control , Hyperpigmentation/etiology , Hyperpigmentation/prevention & control , Laser Therapy/adverse effects , Lasers, Gas/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Double-Blind Method
7.
Contact Dermatitis ; 88(5): 372-382, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36727715

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Glove occlusion might enhance skin sensitivity to a subsequent detergent challenge (occlusion effect). Thus, some skin protection creams (PC) claim to protect against this effect of occlusion, and are recommended to be used before wearing liquid-proof gloves. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of PC applied prior to glove occlusion on the 'occlusion effect'-refers to increased susceptibility of the skin to a model detergent. METHODS: One hundred and eleven volunteers were enrolled in a single-blind, randomized study. Seven PCs were applied before glove occlusion over 7 days (D1-D7). After sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) challenge, we compared the irritation between the areas treated with PC and occlusion alone. Clinical scoring and bioengineering methods (capacitance, transepidermal water loss [TEWL], and colourimetry [erythema]) were used to quantify the irritant reactions. RESULTS: After 1 week of occlusion and PC application, we did not observe significant changes in TEWL, nor in erythema, whereas skin hydration raised in three cream-treated areas. On day 10, after a challenge with SLS, some products significantly aggravated the skin irritation as compared to occlusion alone. CONCLUSIONS: The 'occlusion effect'-shown as higher skin susceptibility to a model detergent-was not mitigated by PCs when applied prior to glove occlusion. On the contrary, some PCs might have negative effects on skin barrier function and augment such sensitivity.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Dermatitis, Irritant , Humans , Dermatitis, Irritant/etiology , Dermatitis, Irritant/prevention & control , Single-Blind Method , Detergents/adverse effects , Skin , Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate/adverse effects , Erythema/chemically induced , Erythema/prevention & control , Emollients , Water , Water Loss, Insensible
8.
Photochem Photobiol Sci ; 21(11): 1853-1868, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35870076

ABSTRACT

Public health campaigns advise minimising UV radiation (UVR) exposure to prevent skin cancer and precancer, e.g. actinic keratosis (AK). A 3-day clinical field study, in Brazil, was performed to evaluate the mobile app Sun4Health® by siHealth Ltd. The app performs real-time monitoring of both erythemal and vitamin D-effective solar radiation doses using satellite data, enabling personalised recommendations on optimal sun exposure time and sunscreen use. When coupled to a wearable device, the app also provides body-site specific recommendations ("3D" version). 59 healthy volunteers were randomised into 3 groups, each given a different app providing: (1) ultraviolet index only (control app), (2) personalised recommendations and sun overexposure alerts (Sun4Health® app), (3) as (2) but connected via Bluetooth to a wearable device to monitor sun exposure in 3D (Sun4Health®-3D app). Participants were offered sunscreens (SPF 30 and 50) to use at their discretion. Erythema, quantified by reflectance spectroscopy, was assessed daily in the mornings and evenings on six body sites. Serum vitamin D (25(OH)D3) was measured before and after the study. Mean increase of erythema (Mexameter® units ± SD) of all exposed body sites combined over 3 days showed 55.76 ± 47.47 for group 1, 40.27 ± 37.91 for group 2 and 37.12 ± 30.69 for group 3 (p < 0.05 for all groups). Mean increase of serum 25(OH)D3 (nmol/l ± SD) showed 1.32 ± 36.49 for group 1, 6.38 ± 21.19 for group 2 and 18.68 ± 35.45 for group 3 (p > 0.05 for all groups). The results show that the Sun4Health® app is safe to use and can modify behaviour to reduce skin erythema (sunburn) yet not decreasing vitamin D status.


Subject(s)
Sunburn , Ultraviolet Rays , Humans , Erythema/etiology , Erythema/prevention & control , Sunburn/prevention & control , Sunscreening Agents/pharmacology , Ultraviolet Rays/adverse effects , Vitamin D
9.
Skin Res Technol ; 28(4): 614-622, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35753079

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Visualizing the ultraviolet (UV) dose on skin serve as an intuitive approach to ensure appropriate sunscreen usage and reduce the risk of erythema. UV dose is determined by a number of external factors, such as properties of sunscreens, weather, and type of outdoor activity. We propose a framework for visualizing UV doses that considers various external factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: First, the skin of a three-dimensional human model was represented using triangular meshes, and various static postures and dynamic motions were simulated to express outdoor activities. Then, we evaluated the persistency and insufficiency properties of sunscreen, which are time dependent and directly affect the effectiveness of the sunscreen skin protection factor (SPF) during UV exposure. Finally, to calculate the UV dose in real time, we tracked the trajectory of the sun and motion of the skin while considering the time-dependent properties of sunscreen. RESULTS: An S/W system was implemented based on the proposed framework to visualize the distribution of UV doses through dynamic color changes in exposed skin areas. The color types include true colors, which represent the minimum erythema dose (MED), and pseudo colors representing states before 1 MED is reached. We devised various examples to discuss the usability of the proposed framework. CONCLUSION: The system conveniently displays the MED according to an individual's skin phototype. When the properties of a wide range of commercial sunscreens are added to the system database, it is expected that the rate of appropriate sunscreen usage by customers will increase.


Subject(s)
Sunscreening Agents , Ultraviolet Rays , Erythema/drug therapy , Erythema/prevention & control , Humans , Skin , Sunscreening Agents/therapeutic use , Ultraviolet Rays/adverse effects
10.
Hautarzt ; 73(4): 276-282, 2022 Apr.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35333933

ABSTRACT

The task of the first sunscreens was to prevent the development of sunburn and, following the spirit of the 1950/1960s, to not impair the tanning of the skin. The need to quantify the protective performance soon arose. Originally with the help of natural-nowadays artificial-sunlight, a method was developed to determine a sun protection factor (SPF). It is formally defined as a ratio between minimum erythema-effective UV dose on sunscreen-protected skin and minimum erythema-effective UV dose on unprotected skin (ISO 24444:2019). Three observations question the suitability of the method. (1) Interlaboratory variability: Despite strict standardization, results of SPF determinations from different laboratories are subject to large variations. (2) Natural vs. artificial sunlight: The radiation spectrum of artificial sunlight differs from that of natural sunlight. SPFs determined with artificial sunlight (as depicted on all sunscreens currently on the market) are significantly too high compared to SPF determination with natural sunlight. (3) Erythema burden: When determining SPF, subjects are exposed to potentially harmful radiation. Against this background alternative methods-in vitro SPF, hybrid diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (HDRS) and in silico calculations-are presented. These have the potential to replace the current method. As an immediate measure, it is recommended to return to the comprehensible description of low, medium, high, and very high protection and in the future to take into account the spectrum of natural sunlight.


Subject(s)
Sunburn , Sunlight , Erythema/drug therapy , Erythema/etiology , Erythema/prevention & control , Humans , Sun Protection Factor/methods , Sunburn/prevention & control , Sunlight/adverse effects , Sunscreening Agents/chemistry
11.
Photochem Photobiol ; 98(5): 1236-1244, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35106770

ABSTRACT

During summer of 2019/2020, Sydney, Australia, experienced several days of extreme air pollution and low visibility due to bushfires. This research presents a case study that investigates the erythemal UV irradiance and resulting 1 h erythemal and 8 h actinic exposures during the worst of these days. Air quality, meteorological and UV data used in the analysis were readily available online or by request from governmental agencies. Analysis showed that even for the lowest visibility day (which had a minimum visibility of less than a kilometer) on 10 December 2019, there was a cumulative 1 h erythemal UV exposure of over 4 SED (standard erythema dose) and a cumulative 8 h exposure of 17 SED by the late afternoon. The 1 h exposure exceeded that of a minimum erythemal dose. Even on this extremely hazy day, these cumulative exposures are enough to exceed the recommended daily exposure limit for actinic exposures weighted with the health sensitivity spectrum for the skin and eyes set by the International Commission of Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection.


Subject(s)
Erythema , Ultraviolet Rays , Australia , Erythema/etiology , Erythema/prevention & control , Humans , New South Wales , Skin
12.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 21(5): 2031-2037, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35066982

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor (EGF) may promote wound healing and decrease laser-induced postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of an EGF-containing cream on PIH, post-laser erythema, and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) after 1,064-nm Q-Switched Nd: YAG laser treatment of Hori's nevus. METHODS: This is a split-face, double-blinded, randomized, controlled study conducted in 30 subjects with bilateral Hori's nevus. After laser treatment, participants were randomized to apply EGF cream on one facial side and placebo on the other side for 8 weeks. The incidence and intensity of PIH were assessed by photographs and melanin indexes (MIs) ratio at baseline, Week 2, Week 4, and Week 8. Post-laser erythema and TEWL were measured at baseline, Day 1, Day 3, and Day 7. Side effects and patient satisfaction score were evaluated. RESULTS: The incidence of PIH was 26.7% in EGF group compared to 20% in placebo. The intensity of PIH was 0.057 (0.033-0.086) and 0.045 (0.027-0.076) in EGF and placebo group, respectively. There was no significant difference in both incidence (p = 0.5) and intensity of PIH (p = 0.145). Post-laser erythema was not statistically different between groups. EGF could alleviate TEWL better than placebo but without statistical significance. Patient satisfaction score was significantly higher in EGF group compared to placebo (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The EGF-containing cream could not prevent PIH. It may reduce laser-induced skin barrier damage. Future studies in more subjects are needed.


Subject(s)
Hyperpigmentation , Lasers, Solid-State , Nevus of Ota , Skin Neoplasms , Asian People , Epidermal Growth Factor/therapeutic use , Erythema/etiology , Erythema/prevention & control , Humans , Hyperpigmentation/drug therapy , Hyperpigmentation/etiology , Hyperpigmentation/prevention & control , Lasers, Solid-State/adverse effects , Nevus of Ota/etiology , Skin Neoplasms/etiology , Treatment Outcome
14.
Photochem Photobiol ; 98(2): 455-460, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34549819

ABSTRACT

The role of topical antioxidants (AOs) on visible light plus ultraviolet A1 (VL+UVA1)-induced skin changes were evaluated. Twenty subjects with skin phototypes (SPTs) I-VI had placebo and concentrations of an AO blend applied to their back (AO 0.5%, 1.0% and 2.0%). Treated and control sites were irradiated with VL+UVA1. Colorimetric and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) assessments were performed immediately, 24 h and 7 days after irradiation. Subjects with SPT I-III had erythema that faded within 24 h, while SPT IV-VI had persistent pigmentation. SPT I-III demonstrated significantly less erythema at the 2% AO site while SPT IV-VI demonstrated significantly less immediate pigmentation at 2% AO site and less pigmentation (approaching significance, P = 0.07) on day 7 compared with control. Immunohistochemistry from biopsies of 2% AO and placebo at 24 h did not demonstrate a significant change in COX-2 or MART-1 for any SPT. There was a decrease in cyclin D1 for SPT IV-VI which was approaching significance (P = 0.06) but not for SPT I-III. The results indicate that topical AO inhibits erythema in SPT I-III and reduces pigmentation in SPT IV-VI caused by VL+UVA1. AO may help prevent worsening of pigmentary disorders and should be incorporated into photoprotection.


Subject(s)
Pigmentation Disorders , Skin Pigmentation , Antioxidants/pharmacology , Erythema/drug therapy , Erythema/etiology , Erythema/prevention & control , Humans , Light , Skin/radiation effects , Ultraviolet Rays
15.
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed ; 38(1): 60-68, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34278599

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is a need for non-invasive biomarkers to assess in vivo efficacy of protective measures aiming at reducing ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure. Stratum corneum (SC) biomarkers showed to be promising markers for internal UVR dose and immune response. PURPOSE: To establish a dose-response relationship for SC biomarkers and explore their suitability for in vivo assessment of the blocking effect of two sunscreens with a high sun protection factor (SPF) (50+). METHODS: Twelve volunteers were exposed to a broad-spectrum UVB (280-320 nm), five times a week, during one week. Unprotected back skin was irradiated with 0.24, 0.48, 0.72 and 1.44 standard erythema dose (SED) and sunscreen-protected skin with 3.6 SED. SC samples for determination of the relative amount of cis-urocanic acid (cUCA) and thirteen immunological makers including cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) were collected after each irradiation. RESULTS: cUCA sharply increased after the first irradiation in a dose-dependent fashion. However, it levelled-off after subsequent exposures and reached a plateau for the highest UV-dose after the third irradiation. None of the immunological markers showed dose-dependency. However, MMP-9, IL-1ß and CCL27 increased gradually from baseline during repetitive exposures to the highest UV-dose. Assessed from cUCA, both sunscreens blocked >98% of the applied UV-dose. CONCLUSIONS: cUCA is a sensitive, non-invasive marker of the internal UVR dose enabling in vivo assessment of the blocking effect of high SPF sunscreens in the UVB-region. Immunological SC markers show low sensitivity in detecting immune response at sub-erythemal UVR dosages, suggesting they might be suitable only at higher and/or repetitive UVR exposure.


Subject(s)
Sunscreening Agents , Ultraviolet Rays , Biomarkers , Erythema/etiology , Erythema/prevention & control , Humans , Skin , Sun Protection Factor , Sunscreening Agents/pharmacology , Ultraviolet Rays/adverse effects
16.
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed ; 38(1): 19-28, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34157168

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Currently, sunscreens' sun protection factor (SPF) and ultraviolet (UV) A protection are tested separately under indoor conditions, without considering external conditions that may affect performance. Studies are often conducted in Caucasian individuals; other racial groups may respond differently. METHODS: An outdoor, double-blind, intra-individual study was performed in 63 healthy Chinese and Caucasian volunteers in Singapore. Subjects underwent one outdoor sun exposure lasting 2-3 hours. ISO reference products P3 (SPF 15), P5 (SPF 30), and P8 (SPF 50+) applied at 2 mg/cm2 were compared against each other and against an untreated exposed area (positive control) and an unexposed area (negative control). Endpoints were investigator global assessment (IGA) of erythema at 24 hours, IGA of pigmentation at 1 week, and colorimetry (a*, L*, and ITA) at 24 hours and 1 week. RESULTS: Clinical erythema and pigmentation scores were statistically significantly different among the three sunscreens, with the highest SPF product providing the highest protection, confirming the discriminatory capacity of the model used. Colorimetric assessment correlated well with clinical evaluation. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the feasibility of ranking sunscreens (at 2 mg/cm2 ) based on clinical effects of high-intensity outdoor solar radiation. Larger studies are needed to look at differences in erythema and pigmentation reactions between Chinese and Caucasian individuals, which could be relevant for photoprotection.


Subject(s)
Sunburn , Sunscreening Agents , China , Double-Blind Method , Erythema/etiology , Erythema/prevention & control , Humans , Sun Protection Factor , Sunscreening Agents/therapeutic use , Ultraviolet Rays/adverse effects
17.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 21(4): 1501-1505, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34132024

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In many ailments, Cyperus rotundus is an effective and safe treatment option. Flavonoids in the oil have anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties. There have been no randomized controlled trials comparing topical C. rotundus oil to the available allopathic modalities for treating post-hair removal laser side effects. OBJECTIVES: Participants in this study were prospectively evaluated for the efficacy of C. rotundus essential oil, compared with hydrocortisone and saline, in managing pain and erythema after laser hair removal. METHODS: Eligible participants (n = 153) were randomly assigned to one of three study groups: topical C. rotundus oil (group 1), hydrocortisone (group 2), or saline (group 3). The following methods were used to assess the results: The Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale was used to rate pain. Erythema was graded on a six-point scale: "no erythema," "slight erythema," "marked erythema," "severe erythema without vesicles," and "severe erythema with vesicles." RESULTS: In terms of anti-inflammatory effects, C. rotundus oil and hydrocortisone did not differ significantly (p > 0.05). However, statistically significant differences in the analgesic effect (P.05) were observed, favoring the oil. CONCLUSIONS: Cyperus rotundus essential oil is a safe and cost-effective treatment for post-laser pain and erythema.


Subject(s)
Cyperus , Hair Removal , Oils, Volatile , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Erythema/drug therapy , Erythema/etiology , Erythema/prevention & control , Hair Removal/adverse effects , Hair Removal/methods , Humans , Oils, Volatile/pharmacology
18.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 86(3S): S27-S37, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34942294

ABSTRACT

Until recently, the primary focus of photobiology has centered on the impact of UV radiation on skin health, including DNA damage and oncogenesis; however, the significant effects of visible light (VL) on skin remain grossly underreported. VL has been reported to cause erythema in individuals with light skin (Fitzpatrick skin types [FSTs] I-III) and pigmentary changes in individuals with dark skin types (FSTs IV-VI). These effects have importance in dermatologic diseases and potentially play a role in conditions aggravated by sun exposure, including phototoxicity in patients with FSTs I to III and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation and melasma in patients with FSTs IV to VI. The induction of free radicals, leading to the generation of reactive species, is one driving mechanism of VL-induced skin pathologies, leading to the induction of melanogenesis and hyperpigmentation. Initial clinical studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of topical sunscreen with antioxidant combinations in inhibiting VL + UV-A1-induced erythema in FSTs I to III and reducing pigmentation in FSTs IV to VI. Antioxidants may help prevent the worsening of pigmentary disorders and can be incorporated into photoprotective strategies. It is essential that dermatologists and the public are aware of the impact of VL on skin, especially in patients with skin of color, and understand the available options for VL protection.


Subject(s)
Antioxidants , Hyperpigmentation , Antioxidants/therapeutic use , Erythema/etiology , Erythema/prevention & control , Free Radicals/pharmacology , Humans , Hyperpigmentation/complications , Hyperpigmentation/prevention & control , Light , Skin , Skin Pigmentation , Ultraviolet Rays/adverse effects
19.
Curr Probl Dermatol ; 55: 157-169, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34698042

ABSTRACT

In 1978, the FDA Advisory Panel proposed both indoor and natural sunlight SPF testing methods but reverted to indoor testing only in 1993. Today's sunscreen sun protection and broad-spectrum claims are based on mandated clinical tests using solar simulators and in vitro spectrophotometers. This research evaluated the protection of 10 high-SPF (30-110), broad-spectrum sunscreen products, as well as 6 sun-protective fabrics against natural sunlight in Arequipa, Peru. Each of the 17 subjects was exposed to natural sunlight for 1 h and 59 min under clear skies, with temperatures and humidity similar to those in an indoor clinical laboratory. Test sites were photographed 16-24 h later. Four dermatologists evaluated the photographs for erythema and persistent pigment darkening (PPD). Perceptible sun-induced skin injury (sunburn and/or pigmentation) was detected at 97% of the sunscreen-protected scores. The most sun-sensitive subjects obtained the least erythema protection. The higher the SPF was, the higher the erythema protection, but the intensity of PPD was also higher. The 2 sunscreens using only FDA-approved sunscreen filters rated 30 SPF and 45+ SPF performed poorly: Eighty-one percent of the 136 scores were graded 1 minimal erythema dose or higher erythema, achieving, at a maximum, SPF of 5-7 in natural sunlight. Sun-protective fabrics tested provided excellent sun protection. The erythema and PPD observed through the sunscreens in less than 2 h are incongruous with the broad-spectrum, high-SPF sunscreen claims. Reapplying these sunscreens and staying in the sun longer, as stated on the product labels, would have subjected the subjects to even more UV exposure. High-SPF, broad-spectrum sunscreen claims based on indoor solar simulator testing do not agree with the natural sunlight protection test results.


Subject(s)
Protective Clothing/standards , Sun Protection Factor/methods , Sunlight/adverse effects , Sunscreening Agents/chemistry , Textiles/standards , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical/methods , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical/standards , Erythema/etiology , Erythema/prevention & control , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Male , Peru , Skin/drug effects , Skin/radiation effects , Skin Pigmentation/drug effects , Skin Pigmentation/radiation effects , Sun Protection Factor/standards , Sunscreening Agents/administration & dosage , Sunscreening Agents/standards
20.
Molecules ; 26(12)2021 Jun 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34204433

ABSTRACT

Catechins are a part of the chemical family of flavonoids, a naturally occurring antioxidant, and a secondary metabolite in certain plants. Green tea catechins are well recognized for their essential anti-inflammatory, photo-protective, antioxidant, and chemo-preventive functions. Ultraviolet radiation is a principal cause of damage to the skin. Studies observed that regular intake of green tea catechins increased the minimal dose of radiation required to induce erythema. The objectives of this systematic review and meta-analysis are to determine the effectiveness of green tea catechins in cutaneous erythema and elucidate whether green tea catechin consumption protects against erythema (sunburn) inflammation. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify the relevant studies. Two researchers carried out independent screening, data extraction, and quality assessment according to the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). The pooled effect of green tea catechins on protection against erythema was assessed using approaches fixed-effects or random-effects model to quantify the effectiveness of green tea catechins in the erythema dose-response. Studies not be included in meta-analyses were summarized narratively. Six randomized controlled studies of enrolled studies regularly administrated green tea catechins orally for 6 to 12 weeks involving healthy volunteers comprising a total of 100 participants were included in the analysis. The results revealed green tea catechins have favorable protection against erythema inflammation even at increased minimal erythema dose (MED) of ultraviolet radiation. Meta-analysis results confirm oral supplementation of green tea catechins is highly effective at low-intensity ultraviolet radiation-induced erythema response (MED range; 1.25-1.30) compared to placebo, showing a significant pooling difference (p = 0.002) in erythema index (SMD: -0.35; 95% CI, -0.57 to -0.13; I2 = 4%, p = 0.40) in the random-effects model. The pro-inflammatory signaling pathways through oral supplementation with green tea catechins are an attractive strategy for photo-protection in healthy human subjects and could represent a complementary approach to topical sunscreens. Therefore, studies that involved green tea catechin in topical applications to human subjects were also evaluated separately, and their meta-analysis is presented as a reference. The evidence indicates that regular green tea catechin supplementation is associated with protection against UV-induced damage due to erythema inflammation.


Subject(s)
Catechin/pharmacology , Erythema/drug therapy , Tea/chemistry , Animals , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/pharmacology , Antioxidants/pharmacology , Catechin/chemistry , Erythema/metabolism , Erythema/prevention & control , Flavonoids/metabolism , Flavonoids/pharmacology , Humans , Inflammation/drug therapy , Skin/metabolism , Sunscreening Agents/pharmacology , Tea/metabolism , Ultraviolet Rays/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...